A lot is being made of the fact that win or lose Obama is breaking ground with his candidacy for president. We are to be congratulated apparently for allowing an African American to run for high office. Not much is being made of the fact that Clinton is also breaking new ground with her candidacy. Aren't we to be congratulated for allowing a woman to run for high office? Some men don't want to admit that they really prefer their women at home keeping the castle tidy. It would take a huge set of balls for a man to talk that stuff in this day and age. But, some of them are thinking it. Is it any more wrong to vote for someone because of his race than it is to vote against him because of his race? I think so. Some women on this board are fostering the belief that women shouldn't think about politics. They do this by posing stupid questions that could be answered quickly by using a search engine. They bat their eyes and ask in their little Betty Boop voices, "What does this mean?" Gag. As long as women like this continue to believe that they are the weaker sex in all things, we will never get to a point where the fact that a woman is running for the presidency isn't newsworthy.