|
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2008 1:41 PM
> I guess your right. Those decent names. Jose Luis
> Zertuche
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2008 1:34 PM
I didn't see Mosley-Mayorgy, but from what I heard of Mosley's performance
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2008 1:32 PM
Why is nobody talking about my Titans? They may be the best team in the
|
|
|
Sep 16, 2008 2:19 PM
> Wahoo!!!
>
> Bills still hot. 12 more games to go!
|
|
|
Sep 16, 2008 12:04 PM
> Gimme Pacman. I think he has Marquez' number.
That's
|
|
|
Sep 16, 2008 11:46 AM
I would definitely make Pacquaio a favorite, but by the slightest of
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28, 2008 2:18 PM
Mayweather has retired, so who is the next in the lb per lb list ... Many Pacquiao???? Are you kidding me? Many is an exciting boxer, but he is by no means the best lb per lb. Just recal that he lost to Morales once, tied once and won a close split decision to Marquez. This is not the performance of the best of the best. Compare, for instance, to Calzaghe's performance: for 10 years the best super midleweight champion, more than 20 defenses, undefeated in more that 40 bouts, and most recently defeated a legend like Hopkins, a great young champion like Kessler and a dangerous challenger like Lacy. This is a true lb per lb champion, NO MANY PACQUIAO.
|
|
1-1 of 1 entries
|
|
|
|
