|
|
For discussions other than boxing...or in addition to!
|
Posts:
2,033
Registered:
10/4/07
|
|
(19714 of 19714)
Dec 4, 2009 11:44 AM
|
Here we go with the bullshit, Mayweather the runner has already agreed to fight March 13 a date that was giving to him by Pacquaio's promoter and blind Pac fans act like Mayweather pulled the date out his ass or something.
Isn't it funny how Floyd is so scared yet he signed 1st-Freddie and all Pacmans people said 50/50 or the fight doesn't happen now Pac wants 60/40. Coach Roach is talking about the fight is 2 soon and Manny has 2 heal from the scars he sustained from the Cotto bout.
Bob Arum Pacquaio's promoter came up with March 13 so get mad @ Pacquaio's promoter-so Freddie says his man wont be ready-Pac has agreed to fight March 13-I mean do these guys talk @ all?
1st Pac is cool with 50/50 now he wants 60/40-it seems like he's tryn 2 find away out of the fight. The Pacman and Coach Roach are the only one's making excuse's and holding up the fight.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,085
Registered:
5/25/07
|
|
(19713 of 19714)
Dec 4, 2009 12:17 AM
|
> > Funeka and Guzman fight end up in a draw, it's
> obvious that Funeka won that fight. Maybe they don't
> want to ruined Guzmans record because this is the
> fighter that Mayweather Sr. keeps on telling before
> that can beat Manny Pacquiao. To all the judges on
> this fight, do you have the hard time editing your
> scorecard, and who's behind it? The boxing promoter
> hired you to judge the fight, why are you letting
> them to be their puppet. Maybe that's the reason why
> it took a while before they hand that decision to
> Michael Buffer. Who promoted this fight? It already
> happenned on Diaz Mallinaggi fight. Be sport and be
> fair.
>
> I think this was one of the craziest decisions I've
> seen. I mean, was there anyone watching that fight
> who thought it was even close to a draw? The first
> maybe two to three rounds Guzman did well, but after
> that it was all Funeka.
I think Guzman won two rounds. Poor Funeka.
http://www.fightinsight.com/2009/11/30/no-kelly-pavlik-no-problem-for-paul-williams/
|
|
|
Posts:
2,033
Registered:
10/4/07
|
|
(19712 of 19714)
Dec 2, 2009 4:14 PM
|
|
This decicison was worst than Lewis vs Holifield-it was the worst 1 I've ever seen and I like Guzman as a fighter but Funeka was all wrong 4 him. Guzman looked pretty good the 1st 2 rounds then all of a sudden his nose started leaking blood and I was damn-which punch did that cause I couldn't tell. It looked like he was barely gettn touched but it was very 1 sided Guzman won maybe 3 rounds tops-the shit was 2 one sided 4 swing rounds but Guzman showed alot of heart I'll give him that.
|
|
|
Posts:
857
Registered:
1/17/08
|
|
(19711 of 19714)
Dec 2, 2009 11:14 AM
|
> Funeka and Guzman fight end up in a draw, it's obvious that Funeka won that fight. Maybe they don't want to ruined Guzmans record because this is the fighter that Mayweather Sr. keeps on telling before that can beat Manny Pacquiao. To all the judges on this fight, do you have the hard time editing your scorecard, and who's behind it? The boxing promoter hired you to judge the fight, why are you letting them to be their puppet. Maybe that's the reason why it took a while before they hand that decision to Michael Buffer. Who promoted this fight? It already happenned on Diaz Mallinaggi fight. Be sport and be fair.
I think this was one of the craziest decisions I've seen. I mean, was there anyone watching that fight who thought it was even close to a draw? The first maybe two to three rounds Guzman did well, but after that it was all Funeka.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,033
Registered:
10/4/07
|
|
(19710 of 19714)
Dec 1, 2009 5:55 PM
|
|
That's not true-I care-so what's the fighter's name and when did he fight- LMMFAO
|
|
|
Posts:
724
Registered:
2/24/08
|
|
(19709 of 19714)
Nov 30, 2009 2:05 AM
|
|
No.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,416
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
|
Posts:
1
Registered:
11/29/09
|
|
(19707 of 19714)
Nov 29, 2009 10:13 AM
|
|
Funeka and Guzman fight end up in a draw, it's obvious that Funeka won that fight. Maybe they don't want to ruined Guzmans record because this is the fighter that Mayweather Sr. keeps on telling before that can beat Manny Pacquiao. To all the judges on this fight, do you have the hard time editing your scorecard, and who's behind it? The boxing promoter hired you to judge the fight, why are you letting them to be their puppet. Maybe that's the reason why it took a while before they hand that decision to Michael Buffer. Who promoted this fight? It already happenned on Diaz Mallinaggi fight. Be sport and be fair.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,033
Registered:
10/4/07
|
|
(19706 of 19714)
Nov 28, 2009 11:58 PM
|
Damn-I missed the fight between Guzman and Funeka but I read Funeka whoop Guzman ass though out the 12 round fight just to get robbed with a draw.
Wow, I didn't know Bute could box that damn good, the dude moves like he's floating or gliding it's crazy. He has really good hand and foot movement and he looks like he just might be better than everyone in the super 6. He really took it 2 Andreade this time. He hurt him with a sweet quick short right 2 the jaw, then put him down for the count with a left to the body.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,033
Registered:
10/4/07
|
|
(19705 of 19714)
Nov 28, 2009 7:31 AM
|
|
I'm not sure about Hatton and Marquez, but I do think Hatton's doing the right thing by taking sometime off. Let's not 4get Marquez has taken his share of shots 2 the skull. Let's see MAB-Pacquaio-Casamayor-Diaz then Floyd-all tough fight for Marquez. He has better skill than Hattn and I think he can pull it off by stoppage-but lets not 4get just about all of us thought Kosta was going 2 kill him
|
|
|
Posts:
7,743
Registered:
5/18/07
|
|
(19704 of 19714)
Nov 25, 2009 6:15 PM
|
>
> I absolutely agree that the Bradley-Petersen winner
> needs to be in any jr. welterweight tournament to
> give it legitimacy. If their format calls for six
> fighters, which it should and easily could, I think
> the other names most deserving are: Kendall Holt,
> Amir Khan, Marcos Maidana, Devon Alexander and the
> Diaz-Malignaggi II winner.
Now you're talking but I see only one European.
I'm no marketing whiz but I don't think it has
wings.
> I doubt Ricky Hatton or
> Juan Manuel Marquez would want in, because of the
> tough level of competition and the paltry purses that
> they'd get relative to what they'd get fighting each
> other or even Manny Pacquiao.
I wonder how the combined gate of the previously
mentioned six compares just to a Hatton / JM Marquez
gate though.
|
|
|
Posts:
458
Registered:
5/24/06
|
|
(19703 of 19714)
Re: MANNY PACQUIAO IS A STEROID USER.
Nov 25, 2009 12:13 PM
|
> IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
>
> http://ringtalk.com/ringtalkradio20091108
>
> CLICK
> HERE TO LISTEN TO KERMIT CINTRON'S REVELATIONS ABOUT
> MANNY PACQUIAO USING STEROIDS.
Cintron is clueless, & he has a peanut sized brain as well.
Roberto Duran started out as a lightweight too, & he won titles all the way up to MIDDLEWEIGHT. It's strange how Pacman isn't constantly compared to Duran who IMO his career-path most resembles.
Evander Holyfield was a cruiserweight, Chris Byrd was a MIDDLEWEIGHT & went up to Heavy weight.
James Toney looked like a completely different person when he KO'ED Michael Nunn.
|
|
|
Posts:
7,327
Registered:
1/26/05
|
|
|
Posts:
2,085
Registered:
5/25/07
|
|
(19701 of 19714)
Nov 23, 2009 10:02 AM
|
> As much as I like Marquez I say styles make fights.
> Hattons pressure, aggression and size would be too
> much. I dont think Marquez has the power to hold him
> off. I despise Hatton but I think he'll be too much
> for Marquez.
I don't see it. Hatton appears to be running on 'e' and very few fighters come back good from the way he got KO'd by many, i.e. this late in their career.
|
|
|
Posts:
12,511
Registered:
4/20/08
|
|
(19700 of 19714)
Nov 22, 2009 11:04 PM
|
|
As much as I like Marquez I say styles make fights. Hattons pressure, aggression and size would be too much. I dont think Marquez has the power to hold him off. I despise Hatton but I think he'll be too much for Marquez.
|
|
|
|
|
