|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(40 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 6:07 PM
|
|
dax, no matter how much you try and discredit Baldomir, he was the unversally recognized welterweight champ. There is no way around that. Boxing is filled with underdog champions. Just becasue an underdog wins the title doesn't mean that the title lineage is stopped. All roads at welterweight led to Baldomir. Whether it was Mayweather, Mosley, Cotto, Williams, Margarito, or whoever. They could have fought and beat anyone they wanted. But until they beat Baldomir, they weren't the welterweight champ. But I have a sneaky feeling that if anyone other than Mayweather had beaten Baldomir, you wouldn't have had any problems recognizing them as the real welterweight champ.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(39 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:56 PM
|
> No: Because magarito was a legit threat. And Baldomir was the champ.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,454
Registered:
10/2/01
|
|
(38 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:54 PM
|
|
No: Because magarito was a legit threat.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(37 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:40 PM
|
> Magarito was not in rebuilding mode what??? > > he was champ and beat cintron. > > get F@ck outtve here with that bullshit. > > > no Floyd fought lineal title holder but not the > champ. > > Floyd took the easy road and thats a fact. > > -- > Edited by daxefex at 11/04/2009 2:33 PM PST Margarito had a paper, vacant title that he won in a fight with Antonio Diaz. Baldomir beat the undisputed champ Judah. Margarito was a paper titlist that was coming off a loss, and his bets win was against an untested prospect. Baldomir had beaten Judah for the lineal title, and then KO'd gatti. Mayweather fought the right guy. I got a feeling that if Mayweather had fought Margarito and not Baldomir, you'd be saying he ducked "Mr. 12 Losses."
|
|
|
Posts:
8,454
Registered:
10/2/01
|
|
(36 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:32 PM
|
Magarito was not in rebuilding mode what??? he was champ and beat cintron. get F@ck outtve here with that bullshit. no Floyd fought lineal title holder but not the champ. Floyd took the easy road and thats a fact. -- Edited by daxefex at 11/04/2009 2:33 PM PST
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(35 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:25 PM
|
> PLEASE STATE WHO HE FOUGHT...? > > > THATS the BIGGEST PILE OF CRAP, IF YOU NOTICE THEY > ALWAYS SAY Floyd fought lineal title holder. > > when trinidad fought oscar that the way we remember > the fight is by the fighters name. > > hearn vs sugar ray > > trinidad vs hopkins > > I can't recall when i have said well cotto fought > lineal champ mosely period. > > the only reason people call baldomir the lineal champ > is because useing his name is shamful. The reason people call Baldomir the lineal champ was because he beat the man that beat the man. That's the way it works. And as I've explained to you before, Mayweather didn't have any other options. You can say Margarito all you want. But the fact is, he was in rebuild mode after the lost to Santos. Mosley had a toothache. And Cotto had yet to make his welterweight debut, and had recently declined a fight with Money at 140. And even if one of those guys had been available, Mayweather fought the champ. No matter what happen in the division, all roads led to Baldomir.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,454
Registered:
10/2/01
|
|
(34 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:16 PM
|
PLEASE STATE WHO HE FOUGHT...? THATS the BIGGEST PILE OF CRAP, IF YOU NOTICE THEY ALWAYS SAY Floyd fought lineal title holder. when trinidad fought oscar that the way we remember the fight is by the fighters name. hearn vs sugar ray trinidad vs hopkins I can't recall when i have said well cotto fought lineal champ mosely period. the only reason people call baldomir the lineal champ is because useing his name is shamful.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(33 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:08 PM
|
> I would gave Floyd an extra 5 dollar. > > instead FLOYD accepted an extra buck. REALLY THAT > LOOKS LIKE AN EXCUSE NOT TO FIGHT. Whatever the reason, Mayweather fought the champion of the division. And no matter how little you respect the champion of that time, Mayweather, Margarito, and every other welter was looking up at Baldomir. Mayweather just happen to the the one to take him out.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,454
Registered:
10/2/01
|
|
(32 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 5:02 PM
|
I would gave Floyd an extra 5 dollar. instead FLOYD accepted an extra buck. REALLY THAT LOOKS LIKE AN EXCUSE NOT TO FIGHT.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(31 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 4:53 PM
|
> horse shit. Fighting Baldomir proved shit. > > Fighting magarito would have a bigger fight. > > specially when Floyd was saying that titles didn't > mean shit. Actually, he made more money for fighting the lineal champ than he would have made fighting Margarito.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,454
Registered:
10/2/01
|
|
(30 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 4:43 PM
|
horse shit. Fighting Baldomir proved shit. Fighting magarito would have a bigger fight. specially when Floyd was saying that titles didn't mean shit.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(29 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 4:17 PM
|
> No one should fault Floyd for fighting Baldo...he had > the crown at the time. But, no one should make a huge > deal out of Floyd beating Baldo either, as he > isnt/wasnt very good. I agree. I've never seen a fighter criticized for fighting the champion in a division before I joined this forum.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,454
Registered:
10/2/01
|
|
(28 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 4:15 PM
|
|
excuses.
|
|
|
Posts:
4,681
Registered:
3/25/07
|
|
(27 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 4:12 PM
|
|
No one should fault Floyd for fighting Baldo...he had the crown at the time. But, no one should make a huge deal out of Floyd beating Baldo either, as he isnt/wasnt very good.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,347
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(26 of 70)
Re: Cotto: "After I beat Pacquiao, he can fight Mayweather
Nov 4, 2009 4:10 PM
|
> lol.. ok Baldomir also had 12 loses. > > you forgot that point huh? I don't care if he had 100 loses. When he fought Mayweather, he was the man in the welterweight division, something that Margarito or Cotto has never been.
|
|
|
|
|