|
|
What did you think?
|
Posts:
1,934
Registered:
6/10/06
|
|
(11 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:48 PM
|
Roach is the man, over 20 world champs under his belt. Pacquiao knows he owes Roach for his success. Without Roach, there is no P4P Pacquiao.
Roach and Arum are on the same page. That plays huge with Pacquiao.
STAND YOUR GROUND, ROACH.
Pacquiao is not going to dump you, Pacquiao is too smart to do that. Manny survived a third world slums on his own and eating one bowl of rice a day and then became the top man of boxing. Pacquiao don't get up there by making stupid decision like dumping Roach.
Who in their right mind would change a thing about a winning card.
*
|
|
|
Posts:
51
Registered:
10/23/09
|
|
(10 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:12 PM
|
|
Ya..def. not bad...especially after those kids
|
|
|
Posts:
9,276
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(9 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:11 PM
|
> Completely agree. Although I think Cotto's dry
> personality is pretty resfreshing and
> Bada$$...Mayweather causes alot more discussion.
>
> Does Cotto's wife/baby momma really have braces?
I saw the braces bro. She's pretty cute though.
|
|
|
Posts:
51
Registered:
10/23/09
|
|
(8 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:08 PM
|
Completely agree. Although I think Cotto's dry personality is pretty resfreshing and Bada$$...Mayweather causes alot more discussion.
Does Cotto's wife/baby momma really have braces?
|
|
|
Posts:
9,276
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(7 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:06 PM
|
> Did you guys feel this was as entertaining as a 24/7
> with Mayweather?
>
> Pac-man KO before 10
No, but Mayweather has a bigger personality. Plus, Mayweather has a better sense of how to promote an event. Pacquaio and Cotto are basically just fighters. Mayweather is an entertainer.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,276
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(6 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:05 PM
|
> I think Pacquiao will get ko'ed inside 4 rounds after
> seeing this 24/7.
> every segment with Pacquiao had some sort of drama
> with it,like when Roach went to him while he was
> eating with the politician,Pacquiao looked like he
> doesn't take it seriously,rolling his eyes and
> giggling.
I interpreted that scene as Pac getting a little irratated with Roach's bullsh*t. Pac's the star, Roach is the guy that squits water in his mouth between rounds. Someone needs to learn their role, before they're dismissed and once again become irrelevant.
|
|
|
Posts:
51
Registered:
10/23/09
|
|
(5 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:03 PM
|
Did you guys feel this was as entertaining as a 24/7 with Mayweather?
Pac-man KO before 10
|
|
|
Posts:
806
Registered:
12/6/07
|
|
(4 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 11:00 PM
|
I think Pacquiao will get ko'ed inside 4 rounds after seeing this 24/7.
every segment with Pacquiao had some sort of drama with it,like when Roach went to him while he was eating with the politician,Pacquiao looked like he doesnt take it seriously,rolling his eyes and giggling.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,276
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(3 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 10:56 PM
|
LMAO at Freddie "The Joke Coach" Roach actually thinking Pac really needs him. I can't wait until Pac figures out that he pays Joke, and really doesn't need him. We have a lot of fun at Roger Mayweather's expense, but I think Joke could learn a thing or two from the Black Mamba. The main thing is the fighter is the boss. Second thing is the fighter isn't your child. Pac, please fire Joke. Because you really don't need him.
On a side note, I am really impressed with Cotto's english. When you don't have subtitles and translators involved, Cotto seems like a pretty cool guy.
|
|
|
Posts:
51
Registered:
10/23/09
|
|
(2 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 10:55 PM
|
I thought the episode lacked alot of interest. I am not a huge Floyd fan but he can sell a fight alot better then Cotto or Pac-man.
Didn't get to see alot of training..I do know from what it looks like and from what I have heard..pac-man has alot higher quality sparring and obviously a much better trainer at his side.
Cotto looks slow...again I don't take much from these highlights HBO shoots but at this point I am still give Pac-man a decisive edge.
|
|
|
Posts:
9,276
Registered:
5/28/08
|
|
(1 of 131)
Oct 24, 2009 10:52 PM
|
|
What did you think?
|
|
|
|
|
