HBO. Its not TV... its HBO.
SERIES | MOVIES | SPORTS | DOCUMENTARIES | HBO FILMS | SCHEDULE | ON DEMAND | SHOP HBO | GET HBO
REAL TIME WITH BILL MAHER
Home

Episode Guide

New Rules

Bios

Community

Video

News

Downloads

Shop Bill Maher

Sign up for the official Real Time with Bill Maher newsletter!
Welcome Guest
Begin the Debate!
As America hurtles toward the next presidential race, the HBO film 'Recount' will relive the fervor of 2000's messy election.

Kevin Spacey and Denis Leary take Al Gore's fight to the courts on May 25 - make your own case on the boards, where the most cogent arguments will be featured in a special poll on HBO.com. And don't worry - this time all the votes will be counted.

The question: Do you believe the Supreme Court's handling of Gore v. Bush was partisan?

http://boards.hbo.com/topic/Hbo-Official-Threads/Believe-Supreme-Courts/1900006032

Opinion of The Right.

[Replies: 4,605]
Pelosi Invests in Iran
Dick Morris and Eileen McGann
Saturday, June 30, 2007

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has disclosed that she holds stock valued at up to $15,000 in Alcatel-Lucent (formerly Alcatel SA), a company with extensive investments in Iran and Sudan — nations that sponsor terrorism.


The disclosure of Pelosi's holdings comes at the same time that legislation is making its way through the California legislature barring state pension fund managers from investing in companies, like Alcatel-Lucent, that do business with "terror-friendly" nations.


According to Divestterror.org, a citizens group pushing a South Africa-style disinvestment program to discourage companies from doing business in terror countries, Alcatel-Lucent's investments in terror countries are so extensive that it is included on the organization's "dirty dozen" list of offending companies.


The organization estimates that the company has invested upwards of $300 million in terror sponsoring nations during the past five years.


According to Divestterror.org, Alcatel is aiding Iran's terrorist activities by providing state controlled companies with data transmission and switching network capabilities. "These contracts have reportedly included the provision of hardware, software, technologies, and training to Iranian companies." It is also installing an undersea telecommunications cable in Iran.


Prior to his overthrow, Alcatel carried out major fiber optic products for dictator Saddam Hussein in Iraq, despite U.S. government warnings to the French company that the project could advance Iraqi military capabilities.


Alcatel is currently "involved in similar telecommunications projects ranging from upgrading networks to the installation underwater fiber optic cables" in Sudan and Libya.

Criticizing Alcatel, former House Armed Services Committee Chairman and current GOP presidential contender Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., expressed his worry over Alcatel's activities in a letter to President Bush. In it, he wrote, "I am concerned about potential transfers of technology or sensitive information to other countries with which Alcatel has business dealings, which have included Burma, China, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria."


Florida has passed, and its governor, Charlie Crist, has signed legislation to state pension funds to sell their equities in companies that do business with Iran, Syria, Sudan, or North Korea. Similar legislation has passed in Louisiana and is making its way through state legislatures in New York, New Jersey, Ohio and California. Missouri's state treasurer Sarah Steelman has implemented a disinvestment strategy administratively.


For the Speaker of the House to own stock in such a company is a particular outrage. She should immediately sell her stock and call on all other members of Congress who hold stock in the company to do likewise.


Only if we send a signal to these companies that their associations with Iran and other terrorist states comes at a huge price can we dissuade them from continued involvement. But if there is a massive selloff of their stock, company executives will feel the pinch in their salaries and bonuses.


Iran is in serious economic trouble. Yesterday, it announced that it would have to ration gasoline — this in a nation with the second largest proven oil reserves. But it can't get at its oil resources without massive foreign investment. As a result, government revenues from the energy industry have dropped from $55 billion in 2006 to a projected $44 billion in 2007.

In a nation where 70 percent of the labor force is employed by the government, the costs in social instability of budget cuts militated by declining energy revenues could be formidable.


Under such pressure, Iran may well have to curb its nuclear ambitions or face the prospect of overthrow by an enraged population.

Mrs. Pelosi: Do your part!


© NewsMax 2007
Last Post May 12, 2008 6:44 AM by: Justice101
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4606 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 12, 2008 6:44 AM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Novak: Michelle Obama Opposes Hillary VP

Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:45 PM

Article Font Size




The Democratic "dream ticket" of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton will never happen -- thanks to Michelle Obama.


Political columnist Robert Novak reported Sunday that Obama's close supporters are convinced he won't offer the vice presidential slot to Clinton because Michelle Obama "has been sniping at Clinton since last summer."


Novak also says Michelle Obama's "public utterances do not reveal the extent of her hostility."



© 2008 Newsmax.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4605 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 12, 2008 6:43 AM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
> What was the point of the diatribe at the head of
> this thread? Word, maybe some of you people could
> just get straight to the point, rather than spouting
> a thousand lines of quote in support of your still
> specious opinions?


I think it's pretty much self explanatory.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Posts: 135
Registered: 3/13/08
(4604 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 9:59 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
What was the point of the diatribe at the head of this thread? Word, maybe some of you people could just get straight to the point, rather than spouting a thousand lines of quote in support of your still specious opinions?
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4603 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 9:43 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
> > > This from a drunk that can't even get a
> > secretary
> > > across a bridge.
> >
> >
> > The lumbering tedosaurus can only drag his own

> weight
> > out of the swamp. Occassionally it loses it's
> balance
> > and drowns its mate, or a nearby female.
> >
> > In this case the alcoholvore resents the

> encroachment
> > of a dominant female, which he feels is
> threatening
> > to his sink hole. He vainly attempts to topple,
> and
> > then crush the female under his massive girth.
> >
> > --
> > Edited by ChiefKahuna at 05/10/2008 7:15 AM PDT

>
> Just stumbled upon this post. Leave Teddy alone. He
> can't help hisself. Being Irish and all.
>
> --
> Edited by mycucina at 05/11/2008 2:41 PM PDT


Teddy should no try to drive across bridges with secretaries

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Posts: 2,579
Registered: 7/17/07
(4602 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 5:36 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
> > This from a drunk that can't even get a
> secretary
> > across a bridge.
>
>
> The lumbering tedosaurus can only drag his own weight
> out of the swamp. Occassionally it loses it's balance
> and drowns its mate, or a nearby female.
>
> In this case the alcoholvore resents the encroachment
> of a dominant female, which he feels is threatening
> to his sink hole. He vainly attempts to topple, and
> then crush the female under his massive girth.
>
> --
> Edited by ChiefKahuna at 05/10/2008 7:15 AM PDT


Just stumbled upon this post. Leave Teddy alone. He can't help hisself. Being Irish and all.

--
Edited by mycucina at 05/11/2008 2:41 PM PDT
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4601 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 5:29 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Operatin Chaos is still working. LOL

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4600 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 5:24 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Now what could be going on here. LOL


Edwards Praises Obama; Doesn't Endorse

Friday, May 9, 2008 1:40 PM

Article Font Size



Former presidential candidate John Edwards still hasn't made a Democratic presidential endorsement.


But the former North Carolina senator seemed to stop just short of it Friday.


Edwards tells NBC's "Today" show that Barack Obama can unite the Democratic party, bring in new voters and get people excited about change.


Edwards said Hillary Rodham Clinton has made a very strong case for her candidacy, but adds "it's very difficult to make the math work" for her nomination.


Edwards dropped his bid for the White House in January. He also was the Democratic vice presidential nominee during Democrat John Kerry's unsuccessful presidential run in 2004.


Edwards lives with his family in Chapel Hill.





© 2008 Associated Press.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4599 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 4:13 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Feminists Sharply Divided Between Clinton, Obama

Saturday, May 10, 2008 4:00 AM

Article Font Size






NEW YORK -- No constituency is more eager to see a woman win the presidency than America's feminists, yet _ despite Hillary Rodham Clinton's historic candidacy _ the women's movement finds itself wrenchingly divided over the Democratic race as it heads toward the finish.

At breakfast forums, in op-ed columns, across the blogosphere, the debate has been heartfelt and sometimes bitter. Are the activist women supporting front-runner Barack Obama betraying their gender? Are Clinton's feminist backers mired in an outdated, women's-liberation mind-set?

Ellen Bravo is a Milwaukee author and activist who advocates on behalf of working women _ and is an Obama supporter. She faults Clinton for her 2002 vote authorizing the Iraq war and believes the Illinois senator would be more supportive of grass-roots political action.

At times, Bravo, 64, has been dismayed by the harsh criticism directed at women like herself from pro-Clinton feminists.

"I felt it was an ultimatum _ vote for Hillary Clinton or you're betraying the women's movement," Bravo said. "It's very self-defeating and alienating, particularly to younger women who, regardless of who they support, don't like to be told, 'Do this. Do that.'"

Clinton supporter Gloria Feldt, former president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, accepts that the women's movement is not single-minded, yet worries that the Obama-Clinton rift is eroding whatever clout it might have.

"We're squandering an opportunity to be seen as a voting bloc that turns elections," Feldt said. "Unless we are working together, in a strategically thought-out effort to vote in our own best interests, we are in danger of never having another election where people will say women can determine the outcome."

Overall, Clinton's now-endangered campaign has survived largely because of her 60 percent to 36 percent edge over Obama among white women voters in the primaries to date. But among college-educated white women _ the demographic of many feminists and of Clinton herself _ her edge is much smaller, 54 percent to 43 percent, according to exit polls conducted for The Associated Press and television networks.

One factor in play is generational. There is a widespread perception in the women's movement that younger feminists tilt more toward Obama while most of their elders favor Clinton.

Indeed, 74-year-old Gloria Steinem, a Clinton supporter and icon of the women's movement, riled some younger, pro-Obama feminists with a New York Times op-ed suggesting that they were in denial about America's persisting "sexual caste system."

Ariel Garfinkel, a sophomore at Mount Holyoke College, wrote one of the many counter-arguments in an online column. She and many other young feminists supported Obama because they perceived the Clinton campaign as trying to capitalize on racial divisions and to impugn Obama's patriotism.

"This pattern of old-style politics and adherence to un-feminist values is part and parcel of the campaign Hillary Clinton has run," Garfinkel wrote. "In this race, Barack Obama is the true feminist."

New York-based author Courtney Martin, also an Obama supporter, wrote on Glamour magazine's blog Glamocracy last month that she was not backing Clinton "in part because she reminds me of being scolded by my mother."

But the 28-year-old Martin has joined in appeals for activist women in the two camps to tone down their hostilities and prepare to work together on behalf of the eventual Democratic nominee.

"I deeply respect what Clinton has endured as a woman painstakingly unknotting gender and power," Martin wrote for The American Prospect.

Another young New York-based feminist writer, Hannah Seligson, backs Clinton and feels somewhat isolated among her mostly pro-Obama peers.

"I shy away from conversations with them," said Seligson, 25. "They're so passionate and there's so much vitriol toward Hillary."

For all the divisions among individual women, there was little dissension at the best-known feminist group _ the National Organization for Women _ before its political action committee endorsed Clinton in March 2007.

NOW's president, Kim Gandy, sees Clinton's determination and combativeness as among her strongest attributes.

"The women who've had to struggle the hardest and run into the most difficulty because they're women are clearly gravitating to a candidate they identify with," Gandy said. "They see her fighting."

Gandy knows some feminists dismiss Clinton as a woman whose political ascension depended on her husband's career, but she rejects that thinking.

"She might have been president instead of him if things had gone a little differently," Gandy said. "No one will ever know whether her marriage to Bill Clinton held her back politically as much as it moved her forward."

While still holding out hope that Clinton can win, Gandy suggests that her defeat would be a huge blow to some feminists. "It's hard to imagine that anytime soon there will be another candidate as extraordinary as Hillary Clinton," she said.

Gloria Feldt conveyed similar sentiment.

"I'd feel very sad to miss this enormous opportunity to bring the United States of America into the circle of nations that have had women as their leaders," she said. "I feel strongly when you have the opportunity to support a women so clearly qualified and capable, do it. Do it for your daughter."

The campaign has brought the women's movement to a crossroads, according to Obama supporter Kate Michelman, the former head of the abortion-rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America.

"We're at a time and place where we don't have to base everything we think about in terms of gender, and that's a sign of progress," she said. "This rigid view that when any woman runs, we have to all fall into line _ that's contradictory to what I consider feminism to be about."


© 2008 Associated Press.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4598 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 11:05 AM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Arguing with Airhead Huffington is like arguing with a fence post.



McCain, Huffington Battle Over Truth

Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:14 AM

Article Font Size




WASHINGTON - Did U.S. Republican presidential candidate John McCain vote for President George W. Bush in 2000?


Liberal Internet blogger Arianna Huffington says McCain told her he did not. But the Arizona senator says he did vote for Bush, a fellow Republican, in 2000 and campaigned for him all over the country after his own attempt to win the party's nomination failed.


The claims and counterclaims may provide an entertaining distraction from the day-to-day battle for votes for this November's presidential election, when McCain will face one of two Democratic contenders, Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.


But Huffington said in an interview the dust-up over the item she posted on her Web site earlier this week has broader meaning than whether or not McCain voted for his rival in the 2000 race for the Republican nomination.


"It's John McCain's relationship with the truth that's at stake here. It's not John McCain's relationship with me," Huffington said.


She said on The Huffington Post -- www.huffingtonpost.com -- this week that McCain told her at a dinner party shortly after the 2000 election that he did not vote for Bush.


A New York Times story about the spat noted other guests at the party said they also heard McCain's comments.


McCain says it never happened and he was loyal to Bush.


"I voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004," he said in an interview with Fox News' "O'Reilly Factor" that aired on Thursday night.


"And not only that, far more important than a vote, I campaigned everywhere in America for him," McCain said. "I enjoyed it. I campaigned with him. I did everything I could to get him elected and re-elected president."

© 2008 Reuters.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4597 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 8:13 AM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Ex-Manager Says OJ Simpson Confessed

Saturday, May 10, 2008 1:00 PM

Article Font Size




LOS ANGELES -- A memorabilia dealer who profited from O.J. Simpson for many years is the latest former crony to write a tell-all book, this one alleging a groggy Simpson, high on marijuana, confessed to killing his ex-wife after he was acquitted.


Mike Gilbert also claims he helped his former friend wiggle out of the murder charges by suggesting how to bloat his hands so they wouldn't fit the notorious bloody gloves.


Gilbert's book, "How I Helped O.J. Get Away With Murder: The Shocking Inside Story of Violence, Loyalty, Regret and Remorse" (Regnery Publishing, 232 pages, $27.95), is due in stores Monday. It was released to The Associated Press in advance.


He said Simpson had smoked pot, took a sleeping pill and was drinking beer when he confided at his Brentwood home weeks after his trial what happened the night of June 12, 1994. Simpson said he went to his ex-wife's condominium, but did not bring a knife with him. Simpson told him Nicole Brown Simpson had one in her hand when she opened the door.


In a soft mumble, Simpson told him: "If she hadn't opened that door with a knife in her hand ... she'd still be alive."


"Nothing more needed to be said," Gilbert writes. "O.J. had confessed to me. There's no doubt in my mind."


Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman were stabbed to death at the entrance to her condominium. The knife was never found.


Simpson's current lawyer Yale Galanter said none of Gilbert's claims are true and that Gilbert is "a delusional drug addict who needs money. He's fallen on very hard times. He is in trouble with the IRS."


"I've talked to O.J. about it," said Galanter, who refused to allow Simpson to comment directly because of his upcoming robbery trial in Las Vegas. "This stuff not only didn't occur but it's not factually supported by the evidence."


The name calling and accusations on both sides showed that deep wounds persist.


In a phone interview, Gilbert called Galanter "an ambulance chaser and an enabler and denier for O.J. I know. I used to do the same thing. I understand the game."


He acknowledged he has IRS problems which he says were caused by Simpson but said, "I could take a drug test and pass it. I highly doubt that O.J. could."


Gilbert is the second sports memorabilia dealer to write a Simpson book this year. Thomas Riccio, who arranged a Las Vegas memorabilia sale that led to Simpson's armed robbery arrest, penned "Busted" last month.


Simpson himself participated in the controversial book, "If I Did It," which he claimed was not a confession. It was withdrawn by the publisher and eventually released last year by the Goldman family to help satisfy a $33.5 million wrongful death judgment.


Gilbert said he continued to represent Simpson for another decade after the alleged confession, hawking items with his autograph, hiding the profits and helping Simpson shield his possessions so they could not be seized by the Goldman family.


Gilbert also claims that he counseled the jailed Simpson during his murder trial to stop taking his arthritis medicine so his hands would swell up and not fit the bloody gloves in court. He offers no proof Simpson followed his advice or that he was taking any medicine, but the drama that played out in court when the gloves didn't fit was central to Simpson's defense.


The prosecutors in Simpson's murder trial, Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden, could not immediately be reached for comment on Gilbert's claims.


Former Gilbert partner Bruce Fromong, who was involved in the Vegas incident, said Gilbert is known for spinning tall tales.


"Mike makes up a lot of great stories," said Fromong. "Mike Gilbert has a ton of skeletons in his closet. He's as dirty as anyone."


Gilbert said he broke with Simpson two years ago because he felt cheated, didn't approve of his lifestyle and was repulsed by "If I Did It." He writes that he was guided to do his own the book by dreams in which he saw the ghosts of his dead grandmother and of Nicole Brown Simpson.


He refers to himself in the book as a "Judas," and says he is betraying Simpson because he's ashamed of what he did and wants to soothe his conscience. He responded to Fromong's criticism by saying he's made mistakes and isn't trying to clean up his image with the book.


He writes that he was not alone in helping Simpson beat the murder charges, but "I hope to be the first to finally confess."


Gilbert said he funneled money from autograph signing appearances to Simpson under the table so the Goldman family could not get it. Gilbert said he paid Simpson 80 percent, kept 20 percent but had to pay taxes on the whole amount. He said Simpson repeatedly told him they'd settle up later.


But they never did and when pushed Simpson reminded him of the Goldman debt: "Hey, at least you don't owe $33.5 million."


"Yeah, I didn't kill anybody either," Gilbert replied. Simpson scowled.


He offers apologies to the dead Nicole Simpson, whom he said he never liked, and to the Goldman family.


"He offers an apology for money laundering?" said Goldman attorney David Cook. "I don't think we want the apology. I think we need the money. Send us a check, not an I'm sorry."


He said he plans to use the book as a treasure map to Simpson's hidden assets.


Gilbert, 53, was a childhood fan of Simpson who was thrilled when another client, football great Marcus Allen, introduced them and they began doing business together.


Gilbert wrote in his book that he was admitted to a world of privilege and he got caught up in a power trip in which he believed he was better than "ordinary people."


Gilbert blames himself and other Simpson friends for failing to act when they detected domestic violence in the Simpson marriage. But he says each time there was a fight between the couple or a call by Nicole to police it was dismissed as part of their obsession with each other or they pretended it didn't happen.


"O.J. mattered more," he said. "The fringe benefits that came with being one of O.J.'s friends mattered more _ or at least we thought they did."


Gilbert wrote the book for many reasons. It wasn't just to make money or hurt Simpson.


"Nothing can hurt O.J.," he said in an interview. "He doesn't have the emotions we have."


In a chapter on the Las Vegas case, he acknowledges that Simpson was in search of memorabilia he believed Gilbert stole from him, including the suit he wore the day he was acquitted.


"I never sold the suit, not even when I was dead broke," he writes. "At least that's something small to be proud of."


But Gilbert does acknowledge that he unsuccessfully tried to sell the suit at one point _ before he sold his book.


___


Associated Press Writer John Rogers contributed to this report.



© 2008 Associated Press.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4596 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 11, 2008 8:11 AM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Iraqi Army Says Al-Qaida Offensive Underway

Saturday, May 10, 2008 6:15 AM

Article Font Size






BAGHDAD -- An Iraqi army commander says U.S-backed forces have launched an operation against al-Qaida in Mosul.

Maj. Gen. Riyadh Jalal Tawfiq, the commander of military operations in the northern city of Mosul, issued a statement announcing the beginning of the offensive against al-Qaida in Iraq on Saturday.


© 2008 Associated Press.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4595 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 10, 2008 3:31 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Israel Will Not Tolerate Nuclear Iran: Olmert

Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:14 PM

Article Font Size



WASHINGTON ? Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert reiterated his warning that the Jewish state will not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran, but expressed hope the international community would be successful in checking Tehran's nuclear ambitions.


"Yes, Israel will not tolerate a nuclear weapon in the hands of people who say openly, explicitly and publicly that they want to wipe Israel off the map. Why should we?" Olmert asked in an interview with The Washington Post.


The newspaper plans to publish the interview in its Sunday issue, but it posted the text on its website late Friday.


At the same time, the prime minister held out hope that diplomatic efforts by the United States, the European Union and Russia aimed at ensuring the peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program would bear fruit.


"I hope they will be successful," Olmert said.


However, he sharply disagreed with findings contained in last year's US National Intelligence Estimate, which argued that Iran's military nuclear program had been halted in 2003.


"Based on the information we have, the military program continues and has never been stopped," Olmert insisted.


"If this program continues, at some point they will be in possession of a nuclear weapon," he warned.

Newsmax.com

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4594 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 10, 2008 12:06 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
Anti-illegal immigration group wants San Diego highway sign


Email this Story

May 10, 6:43 AM (ET)

By ALLISON HOFFMAN











SAN DIEGO (AP) - When members of an anti-illegal immigration group offered to sponsor litter cleanup on local roads, they never imagined California officials would offer them an Adopt-a-Highway stretch near a Border Patrol checkpoint on Interstate 5, the main artery carrying illegal migrants north from the U.S.-Mexico border.

On Friday, lawyers for the San Diego Minutemen told a federal judge that the state had no right to rescind the offer after state legislators complained to the California Department of Transportation. The group asked that its blue Adopt-a-Highway sign be put back where it stood without incident for about six weeks until the agency removed it in January.

"We were moved to silence our message in response to pressure from the open border advocates and the Latino caucus," said Minutemen attorney Robert Fuselier. "It all comes down to one thing: We can't have our speech because if we do, people who don't like it might become unruly and unlawful."

Attorneys for the state contend the sign was removed because of concerns that demonstrators or vandals could create safety hazards for the 160,000 drivers who pass the checkpoint daily and for Minutemen volunteers collecting litter by the roadside.

The Minutemen have had a polarizing influence in San Diego the last several years, achieving hero status among advocates of tightening border restrictions and sparking outrage from immigrant groups who accuse members of harassing migrant workers.

State lawyer Jeff Benowitz told U.S. District Judge William Q. Hayes the Adopt-a-Highway signs amounted to a "thank-you" from the state, not political messages protected under the First Amendment. He said transportation officials planned to end all sponsorship of roads near Border Patrol stations, and had offered to reassign the Minutemen to a two-mile stretch of state route in a less-trafficked area in eastern San Diego County.

Hayes asked whether the state would continue moving the Minutemen sign if protests followed it.

"It would seem you're saying you're allowing the people who are unhappy with the message to dictate who can be in the program," the judge said.

"We can do that," Benowitz responded. "It is not a public forum."

Courts have found otherwise. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the Ku Klux Klan after Missouri officials sought to bar the group from its Adopt-a-Highway program under a regulation prohibiting groups that deny membership based on race or with a documented history of violence.

State legislators, meanwhile, renamed the contested stretch of highway the "Rosa Parks Highway" in honor of the black woman arrested in 1955 when she refused to give up her seat to a white man on a city bus in Montgomery, Ala.

California assemblywoman Lori Saldana of San Diego said she was considering legislation that would stop the transportation department from accepting new sponsorships until it develops standards governing who qualified to participate in the highway adoption program.

"We want them to say what constitutes a legitimate group," Saldana said after the hearing. "Do we want these people allowed on a highway near a security checkpoint?"

Police searched the home of San Diego Minutemen leader Jeff Schwilk in 2007 during an investigation into alleged vandalism at three migrant camps in San Diego's McGonigle Canyon. No members of the group were arrested.

"We are not a hate group," Schwilk said outside the courtroom Friday. "The open borders people have made it very clear that they don't want our participation anywhere in San Diego County."

He said neither the sign nor the group's litter cleanup activities created hazards during the six weeks the sign stood.

Hayes said he would issue a written decision on the matter, but it was unclear when.

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Justice101
Posts: 3,767
Registered: 7/2/07
(4593 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 10, 2008 12:01 PM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
> > This from a drunk that can't even get a
> secretary
> > across a bridge.
>
>
> The lumbering tedosaurus can only drag his own weight
> out of the swamp. Occassionally it loses it's balance
> and drowns its mate, or a nearby female.
>
> In this case the alcoholvore resents the encroachment
> of a dominant female, which he feels is threatening
> to his sink hole. He vainly attempts to topple, and
> then crush the female under his massive girth.
>
> --
> Edited by ChiefKahuna at 05/10/2008 7:15 AM PDT


:^O

--
"Opinion of The Right"
The #1 thread on the RT board, Again.
Hillary is the Anti-Christ.
Operation Chaos is right on target.
Doctordog, a board legend.
Posts: 2,039
Registered: 3/15/06
(4592 of 4606)

Re: Opinion of The Right.

May 10, 2008 10:13 AM
Rate this post:
1 star
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
> This from a drunk that can't even get a secretary
> across a bridge.



The lumbering tedosaurus can only drag his own weight out of the swamp. Occassionally it loses it's balance and drowns its mate, or a nearby female.

In this case the alcoholvore resents the encroachment of a dominant female, which he feels is threatening to his sink hole. He vainly attempts to topple, and then crush the female under his massive girth.

--
Edited by ChiefKahuna at 05/10/2008 7:15 AM PDT
Page: of 308
Poll
What do you do with your weekend?
How do you spend your time off...if you are off.
Votes: 11