|
|
For whatever's pissing you off, whenever it's pissing you off. Enjoy.  -- If you ain't eva been to the ghetto Don't eva come to the ghetto 'Cause you wouldn't understand the ghetto So stay the fuck out of the ghetto.
|
Posts:
3,845
Registered:
9/27/05
|
|
(4359 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 10:40 PM
|
> If Maher did read some of these a lot of posters
> would have been banned.
You think LiveWorld would listen to him any more than they do us? (Meant as a joke).
|
|
|
Posts:
5,000
Registered:
3/19/05
|
|
(4358 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 10:11 PM
|
> I swear to you all...he doesn't check the forum to
> answer your questions.
bartman911,
You burst so many people's bubbles with that!
If Maher did read some of these a lot of posters would have been banned.
|
|
|
Posts:
11,959
Registered:
11/1/01
|
|
(4357 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 9:23 PM
|
|
Point taken.
|
|
|
Posts:
1,658
Registered:
9/16/09
|
|
(4356 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 9:22 PM
|
> I take it you've been to the Opinion of the Right
> thread? 
Not for a long time. Nothing to see there. But asshattery leaks into all of the threads at one time or another.
|
|
|
Posts:
11,959
Registered:
11/1/01
|
|
(4355 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 8:39 PM
|
|
I take it you've been to the Opinion of the Right thread?
|
|
|
Posts:
1,658
Registered:
9/16/09
|
|
(4354 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 12:57 PM
|
|
People who waste our time with superficial, ignorant posts.
|
|
|
Posts:
4,503
Registered:
7/15/07
|
|
(4353 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 12:55 PM
|
> I swear to you all...he doesn't check the forum to
> answer your questions.
You have to admire their attempts though. As if Bill did read here he'd be interested in how pissed off people are at him. Crazy world.
|
|
|
Posts:
4,412
Registered:
9/3/09
|
|
(4352 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 12:53 PM
|
> I swear to you all...he doesn't check the forum to
> answer your questions.
That's a given. But I have a feeling his staff troll around here looking for ideas for some of their "bits". Was it merely coincidence that on this week's show he did a bit on alternate titles for Palin's forthcoming autobiography just days after I posted the same idea? That includes the title "Very Low Expectations"? HUh? HUH???
Damn you, Real Time staff!!! I demand compensation!
|
|
|
Posts:
8,793
Registered:
9/15/07
|
|
(4351 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 12:31 PM
|
|
I swear to you all...he doesn't check the forum to answer your questions.
|
|
|
Posts:
4,503
Registered:
7/15/07
|
|
(4350 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 12:49 AM
|
> > > > > I also read the original posts.
> None
> > of
> > > them
> > > > "excused
> > > > > child rape." Quotes taken out of
> > context
> > > are
> > > > lies.
> > > > > You are lying. Nobody defended
> child
> > rape.
> > > You
> > > > can't
> > > > > point to a single original post.
> You
> > are
> > > > telling
> > > > > vicious offensive lies.
> > > >
> > > > I beg to differ. I read it as well,
> and I
> > agree
> > > with
> > > > Frank 100%. DaNil's post basically
> argued
> > 30
> > > years
> > > > had past...a hole was used...get over
> it.
> > >
> > > In Franks world, pointing out the
> improprieties
> > of
> > > this specific case means you think its okay
> to
> > fuck
> > > children.
> >
> > So you think "it was 30 years ago" is an
> impropriety
> > of this specific case?
> >
> > I don't think that word means what you think it
> means.
>
> No, apparently you didn't read any of my previous
> posts.
I read what you responded to and your response. They didn't seem to go together.
Read it again slowly.
|
|
|
Posts:
4,503
Registered:
7/15/07
|
|
(4349 of 5484)
Oct 3, 2009 12:48 AM
|
> You wouldn't talk to me this way if we were standing
> face to face.
You're absolutely right. Face to face, I wouldn't be censored.
|
|
|
Posts:
31,296
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(4348 of 5484)
Oct 2, 2009 10:38 PM
|
Why didn't Janeane Garofalo shampoo and or comb her hair for the show?
Sheesh!
|
|
|
Posts:
31,296
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(4347 of 5484)
Oct 2, 2009 10:58 AM
|
|
Winter is here. I'm loving it.
|
|
|
Posts:
12,614
Registered:
7/19/06
|
|
(4346 of 5484)
Oct 2, 2009 10:02 AM
|
> > > > In Franks world, pointing out the
> > improprieties
> > > of
> > > > this specific case means you think its
> okay
> > to
> > > fuck
> > > > children.
> > >
> > > I believe I've known Frank a few years
> longer
> > than
> > > you have, and I can assure you that is far
> from
> > true.
> >
> > You aren't seeing him through a mans perspective
> and
> > unless you've actually met him, spare me your
> > indignation.
> >
> > --
> > Edited by Rutheford at 10/01/2009 1:58 PM PDT
>
> As a man, I understand that my larger frame is meant
> to protect, not prey upon. An understanding
> Polanski, and apparently others, don't get.
You wouldn't talk to me this way if we were standing face to face.
|
|
|
Posts:
12,614
Registered:
7/19/06
|
|
(4345 of 5484)
Oct 2, 2009 9:50 AM
|
> > > > I also read the original posts. None
> of
> > them
> > > "excused
> > > > child rape." Quotes taken out of
> context
> > are
> > > lies.
> > > > You are lying. Nobody defended child
> rape.
> > You
> > > can't
> > > > point to a single original post. You
> are
> > > telling
> > > > vicious offensive lies.
> > >
> > > I beg to differ. I read it as well, and I
> agree
> > with
> > > Frank 100%. DaNil's post basically argued
> 30
> > years
> > > had past...a hole was used...get over it.
> >
> > In Franks world, pointing out the improprieties
> of
> > this specific case means you think its okay to
> fuck
> > children.
>
> So you think "it was 30 years ago" is an impropriety
> of this specific case?
>
> I don't think that word means what you think it means.
No, apparently you didn't read any of my previous posts.
|
|
|
|
|
