|
|
For whatever's pissing you off, whenever it's pissing you off. Enjoy.  -- If you ain't eva been to the ghetto Don't eva come to the ghetto 'Cause you wouldn't understand the ghetto So stay the fuck out of the ghetto.
|
Posts:
1,170
Registered:
9/16/09
|
|
(5063 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:43 PM
Rate this post:
|
|
The ignore button is for erasing the ravings of trolls.
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5062 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:42 PM
|
> > I don't know of anyone who's tried to or even
> > proposed getting Gladys banned. (Wishing that
> she
> > would leave is another matter and hardly
> unethical,
> > so to speak).
> >
> > Whether or not she reports others is of no real
> > consequence to me. There are plenty of other
> reasons
> > to dislike her...see my earlier post.
> >
> > And before you tell me to ignore here, don't
> bother.
> > I already have. Somebody asked why everyone was
> > picking on her...I'm simply responding to that
> > inquiry.
>
> That was me, and I didn't say picking on her...I
> asked why is everyone coming down so hard....but to
> me it's obvious....she doesn't follow along with the
> pack. Neither do I and have been under the same
> attack before. I don't care if it's the greatest,
> most sensitive member here calling her Gladys is just
> pushing her to the side because you don't like what
> she has to say.
>
> It's cowardly and it's the kind of peer pressure we
> have seen here before.
>
> The best posters are the ones who stand on their own
> convictions and do not waiver from pressure.
>
> I could name tons of people that have been attacked
> for others they align themselves with or for the
> supposed "Bigoted" remarks about Muslims or
> Christians or (name your own)....but I won't tell you
> to ignore her spot.
>
> The Ignore button is for people who can't handle the
> thoughts of others and have to just hide those ideas
> away and not look at them. I ignore the old fashioned
> way....by not responding.
^5
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5061 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:40 PM
|
> > > > What is wrong with Michelle Obama?
> > >
> > > She has man arms.
> >
> >
> > LOL - I meant what is wrong with discussing her.
> I
> > guess some people have taken exception of your
> thread
> > about her.
> >
> > Yet, if Sarah Palin had joined a reality show,
> > there'd be 5 threads created about it by now...
> >
> > --
> > Edited by rdfan at 11/06/2009 1:33 PM PST
>
> Did you even read the article? She is making one
> appearance on the program to highlight healthy eating
> for children.
Oh. LOL:. 
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5060 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:39 PM
|
> > > What is wrong with Michelle Obama?
> >
> > She has man arms.
>
>
> LOL - I meant what is wrong with discussing her. I
> guess some people have taken exception of your thread
> about her.
>
> Yet, if Sarah Palin had joined a reality show,
> there'd be 5 threads created about it by now...
>
> --
> Edited by rdfan at 11/06/2009 1:33 PM PST
The fear of people knowing how the Obamas really are is becoming clearer and clearer every day.
They can't take it because they voted for them.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,155
Registered:
9/3/09
|
|
(5059 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:37 PM
|
> > > > What is wrong with Michelle Obama?
> > >
> > > She has man arms.
> >
> >
> > LOL - I meant what is wrong with discussing her.
> I
> > guess some people have taken exception of your
> thread
> > about her.
> >
> > Yet, if Sarah Palin had joined a reality show,
> > there'd be 5 threads created about it by now...
> >
> > --
> > Edited by rdfan at 11/06/2009 1:33 PM PST
>
> Did you even read the article?
That would require effort.
She is making one
> appearance on the program to highlight healthy eating
> for children.
How dare she!!!
|
|
|
Posts:
1,170
Registered:
9/16/09
|
|
(5058 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:35 PM
|
> > > What is wrong with Michelle Obama?
> >
> > She has man arms.
>
>
> LOL - I meant what is wrong with discussing her. I
> guess some people have taken exception of your thread
> about her.
>
> Yet, if Sarah Palin had joined a reality show,
> there'd be 5 threads created about it by now...
>
> --
> Edited by rdfan at 11/06/2009 1:33 PM PST
Did you even read the article? She is making one appearance on the program to highlight healthy eating for children.
|
|
|
Posts:
8,555
Registered:
6/12/07
|
|
(5057 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:33 PM
|
> > What is wrong with Michelle Obama?
>
> She has man arms.
LOL - I meant what is wrong with discussing her. I guess some people have taken exception of your thread about her.
Yet, if Sarah Palin had joined a reality show, there'd be 5 threads created about it by now...
--
Edited by rdfan at 11/06/2009 1:33 PM PST
|
|
|
Posts:
1,170
Registered:
9/16/09
|
|
(5056 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:33 PM
Rate this post:
|
That was me, and I didn't say picking on her...I asked why is everyone coming down so hard....but to me it's obvious....she doesn't follow along with the pack. Neither do I and have been under the same attack before.
Picking on/coming down hard on...isn't that the same thing? Why nitpick?
Ronnie is a shit stirrer. She never has anything to say. She only posts lol, , and rme. Unless it's about the Obamas. Then she will post a link to an article and make a snide remark.
There are a lot of very intelligent people here who can write a good argument on a number of topics. We may not agree with each other, but we respect the fact that someone takes the effort to put forth their opinions in a thoughtful manner. She isn't one of them. So in that sense, no she doesn't follow the pack.
--
Edited by solong2 at 11/06/2009 1:33 PM PST
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5055 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:32 PM
|
> and I spelled it "Their" again! LOL! Should be
> "They're".
Good thing I didn't report you for that.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,955
Registered:
12/22/06
|
|
(5054 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:28 PM
|
|
and I spelled it "Their" again! LOL! Should be "They're".
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5053 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:25 PM
|
> It's the oldest strategy on these boards..."Their
> trying to get me banned".
>
> Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
It's a joke.
|
|
|
Posts:
2,955
Registered:
12/22/06
|
|
(5052 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:25 PM
|
> I don't know of anyone who's tried to or even
> proposed getting Gladys banned. (Wishing that she
> would leave is another matter and hardly unethical,
> so to speak).
>
> Whether or not she reports others is of no real
> consequence to me. There are plenty of other reasons
> to dislike her...see my earlier post.
>
> And before you tell me to ignore here, don't bother.
> I already have. Somebody asked why everyone was
> picking on her...I'm simply responding to that
> inquiry.
That was me, and I didn't say picking on her...I asked why is everyone coming down so hard....but to me it's obvious....she doesn't follow along with the pack. Neither do I and have been under the same attack before. I don't care if it's the greatest, most sensitive member here calling her Gladys is just pushing her to the side because you don't like what she has to say.
It's cowardly and it's the kind of peer pressure we have seen here before.
The best posters are the ones who stand on their own convictions and do not waiver from pressure.
I could name tons of people that have been attacked for others they align themselves with or for the supposed "Bigoted" remarks about Muslims or Christians or (name your own)....but I won't tell you to ignore her spot.
The Ignore button is for people who can't handle the thoughts of others and have to just hide those ideas away and not look at them. I ignore the old fashioned way....by not responding.
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5051 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:24 PM
|
> What is wrong with Michelle Obama?
She has man arms.
She is more
> relevant than Sarah Palin, yet Host_Jim and Cynic
> seem to have a somewhat creepy obsession with her.
That takes the attention off of Michelle, Barack and his administration.
|
|
|
Posts:
30,809
Registered:
9/5/01
|
|
(5050 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:22 PM
|
> Oddly enough people accuse Ronnie of trying to get
> people banned....and these same people are demonizing
> her to get her to leave or be banned as well.
>
> I have seen nothing but accusations and there is no
> way to say a member gets anyone banned. I know
> several people banned from this site and they admit
> it was their behavior not the one reporting them.
>
> There is a great deal of freedom on this board to
> hang yourself.....and people do it all the time.
They're like a broken record. LOL. I've admitted numerous times that I reported a filthy poster every time he made a filthy post to me and about my mother.
WTF else did they expect? Oh right, they didn't see anything wrong with it and LOL about it.
It just goes to show their character.
Nothing to be proud of, I must say.
|
|
|
Posts:
3,155
Registered:
9/3/09
|
|
(5049 of 5333)
Nov 6, 2009 4:17 PM
Rate this post:
|
I don't know of anyone who's tried to or even proposed getting Gladys banned. (Wishing that she would leave is another matter and hardly unethical, so to speak).
Whether or not she reports others is of no real consequence to me. There are plenty of other reasons to dislike her...see my earlier post.
And before you tell me to ignore here, don't bother. I already have. Somebody asked why everyone was picking on her...I'm simply responding to that inquiry.
|
|
|
|
|
